Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These NATO Cooperation results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 816 hits. Analysis detected 5,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 12,760 topics). This NATO Cooperation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
NATO Cooperation
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Survival Stories1%
⁠0%Pizza Oven1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%NATO Cooperation (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 7,304
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
NATO Cooperation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
NATO Cooperation vs sitewide
NATO Cooperation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos