Topic summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Forests results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (14,510 of 22,694 topics). This National Forests is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
National Forests
Topic details
Total words: 2,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos