Author summary
36%1 analyzed article/video651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Henry results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,118 of 8,623 authors). This Megan Henry is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Megan Henry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
41%Megan Henry (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,604
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos