Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasa Programs results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 561 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (9,509 of 13,018 topics). This Nasa Programs is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Nasa Programs
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nasa Programs attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nasa Programs vs sitewide
Nasa Programs attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.