Topic summary
6%1 analyzed article/video946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Multiplayer Beta results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 667 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,838 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (9,206 of 24,027 topics). This Multiplayer Beta is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Multiplayer Beta
Topic details
Total words: 2,838
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate