Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mobile Integration results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 775 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (19,909 of 23,967 topics). This Mobile Integration is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Mobile Integration
Topic details
Total words: 3,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos