Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video2,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Academy results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 585 hits. Analysis detected 1,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (13,653 of 24,569 topics). This Military Academy is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Military Academy
Topic details
Total words: 6,018
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos