Topic summary
30%1 analyzed article/video727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megafauna Extinction results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 1,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,181 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (3,196 of 11,713 topics). This Megafauna Extinction is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Megafauna Extinction
Topic details
Total words: 2,181
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Megafauna Extinction attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Megafauna Extinction vs All Other Publications
Megafauna Extinction attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos