Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Schools results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 208 hits. Analysis detected 1,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (16,845 of 22,278 topics). This Medical Schools is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Medical Schools
Topic details
Total words: 4,384
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos