Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,664 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Math Standards results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 688 hits. Analysis detected 3,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,797 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (7,141 of 13,018 topics). This Math Standards is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.

Math Standards

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠46%	Math Standards (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,797

Article count: 1

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Math Standards attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Math Standards vs sitewide

Math Standards attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

How Utah unwittingly set off a fight over math standards⁠^65%

KUER⁠^0%By Neal Morton⁠^0% The Hechinger Report⁠^0%2/12/2026, 9:00:00 AM