Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Malpractice results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 638 hits. Analysis detected 2,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,296 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (17,162 of 24,545 topics). This Legal Malpractice is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Legal Malpractice
Topic details
Total words: 4,296
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos