Topic summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,794 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juno Awards results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 1,044 hits. Analysis detected 8,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,176 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (12,210 of 13,018 topics). This Juno Awards is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Juno Awards attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Juno Awards vs sitewide
Juno Awards attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.