Topic summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Recusal results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (10,386 of 24,545 topics). This Judicial Recusal is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Judicial Recusal
Topic details
Total words: 1,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos