Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Israeli Palestinian Peace Process results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 634 faulty-reasoning hits from 970 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 22,266 topics). This Israeli Palestinian Peace Process is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Israeli Palestinian Peace Process
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 970
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles970 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 30.3%30.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.2%16.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos