Topic summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Negotiations results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 824 hits. Analysis detected 8,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,940 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 32% (8,923 of 13,018 topics). This Iran Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Iran Negotiations
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran Negotiations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran Negotiations vs sitewide
Iran Negotiations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.