Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,426 analyzed words

BS Summary: These International Relations Theory results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 4,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,417 of 15,785 topics). This International Relations Theory is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.

International Relations Theory

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠28%	International Relations Theory (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 5,704

Article count: 1

Authors

Parag Khanna

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

International Relations Theory attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

International Relations Theory vs sitewide

International Relations Theory attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Order Without Order⁠^53%

Foreign Policy⁠^29%By Parag Khanna⁠^0%4/17/2026, 7:30:20 PM