Topic summary
15%1 analyzed article/video532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Courts results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 1,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (7,852 of 15,120 topics). This International Courts is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
International Courts
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
International Courts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
International Courts vs sitewide
International Courts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.