Topic summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institutional Independence results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 1,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (13,645 of 23,916 topics). This Institutional Independence is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Institutional Independence
Topic details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos