Topic summary
2%1 analyzed article/video1,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institute For Justice results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Begging the Question, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 1,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,474 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (13,663 of 14,686 topics). This Institute For Justice is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Institute For Justice
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Institute For Justice attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Institute For Justice vs sitewide
Institute For Justice attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.