Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video2,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Individual Action results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 4,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (19,352 of 21,936 topics). This Individual Action is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Individual Action
Topic details
Total words: 8,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos