Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video5,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights (iran) results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 4,505 hits. Analysis detected 17,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,975 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 52% (6,273 of 13,018 topics). This Human Rights (iran) is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Human Rights (iran)
Topic details
Total words: 14,975
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Rights (iran) attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Rights (iran) vs sitewide
Human Rights (iran) attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.