Topic summary
14%1 analyzed article/video882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Animal Conflict results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 1,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,646 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,414 of 16,562 topics). This Human Animal Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Human Animal Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 2,646
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Animal Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Animal Conflict vs sitewide
Human Animal Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos