Author summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Sacca results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 1,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,646 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (5,079 of 6,239 authors). This Paul Sacca is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Paul Sacca
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠19%Paul Sacca (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,646
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Paul Sacca attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Paul Sacca vs sitewide
Paul Sacca attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos