Topic summary
21%1 analyzed article/video1,000 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Court Reform results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 1,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (20,199 of 21,385 topics). This Housing Court Reform is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Housing Court Reform
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Housing Court Reform attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Housing Court Reform vs sitewide
Housing Court Reform attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.