Author summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos2,363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Smith-Perez results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,642 hits. Analysis detected 4,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,452 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (7,171 of 8,323 authors). This Adam Smith-Perez is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Adam Smith-Perez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠14%Adam Smith-Perez (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,452
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Adam Smith-Perez attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Adam Smith-Perez vs sitewide
Adam Smith-Perez attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos