Topic summary
87%1 analyzed article/video954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthcare Economics results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 293 hits. Analysis detected 2,563 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,862 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 51% (6,742 of 13,599 topics). This Healthcare Economics is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Healthcare Economics
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Healthcare Economics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Healthcare Economics vs sitewide
Healthcare Economics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.