Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Data results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Bandwagon, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 744 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (10,157 of 24,303 topics). This Health Data is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Health Data
Topic details
Total words: 1,492
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos