Topic summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Google Wallet results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 2,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (9,509 of 21,826 topics). This Google Wallet is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Google Wallet
Topic details
Total words: 3,504
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos