Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gender Identity In Schools results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 382 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,390 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,262 topics). This Gender Identity In Schools is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gender Identity In Schools
Topic details
Total words: 2,390
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos