Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emily Walkenhorst results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 83 hits . Analysis detected 382 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,390 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,706 authors). This Emily Walkenhorst is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Emily Walkenhorst
Author details
Total words: 2,390
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst