Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video2,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frugality results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 503 hits. Analysis detected 3,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (19,171 of 24,545 topics). This Frugality is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Frugality
Topic details
Total words: 8,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos