Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forensic Technology results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 780 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,352 of 24,545 topics). This Forensic Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Forensic Technology
Topic details
Total words: 1,884
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 6.9%6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Horn Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos