Topic summary
⁠14%2 analyzed articles/videos1,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forensic Science results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 2,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,818 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (11,912 of 12,340 topics). This Forensic Science is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Forensic Science
Topic details
Total words: 5,818
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Forensic Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Forensic Science vs sitewide
Forensic Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos