Author summary
86%1 analyzed article/video769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Perkin Amalaraj results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 3,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,147 of 5,024 authors). This Perkin Amalaraj is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Perkin Amalaraj
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Perkin Amalaraj attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Perkin Amalaraj vs sitewide
Perkin Amalaraj attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.