Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Policy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 628 hits. Analysis detected 5,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,916 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (8,816 of 13,018 topics). This Food Policy is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Food Policy
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Food Policy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Food Policy vs sitewide
Food Policy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.