Topic summary

⁠6%1 analyzed article/video1,419 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Food Pantries results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 457 hits. Analysis detected 576 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,838 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,946 of 17,194 topics). This Food Pantries is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.

Food Pantries

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Wyomings Big Show	1%
⁠0%	Wyoming's Big Show	1%
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠78%	Food Pantries (selected)	6%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 2,838

Article count: 1

Authors

Laura Tillman

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Food Pantries attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Food Pantries vs sitewide

Food Pantries attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

After losing SNAP benefits, some CT refugees are struggling to afford food⁠^18%

CT Mirror⁠^35%By Laura Tillman⁠^31%7/31/2026, 2:00:00 AM