Topic summary
ā 4%1 analyzed article/video622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Freedom Laws results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 796 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ā 17% (13,971 of 16,806 topics). This Food Freedom Laws is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Food Freedom Laws
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Food Freedom Laws attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Food Freedom Laws vs sitewide
Food Freedom Laws attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.