Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video871 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Fifa World Cups results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,508 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,293 of 16,562 topics). This Fifa World Cups is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.

Fifa World Cups

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠8%	Fifa World Cups (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,484

Article count: 1

Authors

Achim Zeileis

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Fifa World Cups attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Fifa World Cups vs sitewide

Fifa World Cups attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

We ran 100,000 computer simulations of the World Cup. And the winner will be …⁠^13%

The Conversation⁠^0%By Achim Zeileis⁠^0%6/9/2026, 5:19:44 AM