Topic summary
98%1 analyzed article/video985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Regulation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 821 hits. Analysis detected 4,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,075 of 14,646 topics). This Federal Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Federal Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 2,955
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Regulation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Regulation vs sitewide
Federal Regulation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos