Author summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Greene results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 821 hits. Analysis detected 4,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (845 of 5,945 authors). This Peter Greene is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Peter Greene
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠86%Peter Greene (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,955
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Peter Greene attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Peter Greene vs sitewide
Peter Greene attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos