Topic summary
32% 1 analyzed article/video 639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Proposal results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 209 hits . Analysis detected 1,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 45% (11,995 of 21,822 topics). This Federal Proposal is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Federal Proposal
Topic details
Total words: 2,556
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst