Topic summary

⁠14%1 analyzed article/video387 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Federal Incentives results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Anchoring Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 257 hits. Analysis detected 933 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (6,012 of 16,802 topics). This Federal Incentives is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.

Federal Incentives

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Wyomings Big Show	1%
⁠0%	Wyoming's Big Show	1%
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠65%	Federal Incentives (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,548

Article count: 1

Authors

Solange Reyner

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Federal Incentives attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Federal Incentives vs sitewide

Federal Incentives attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Commerce Backs $874 Million in AI Chip Research⁠^19%

Newsmax⁠^79%By Solange Reyner⁠^67%7/30/2026, 4:59:36 PM