Topic summary

⁠98%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 618 faulty-reasoning hits from 417 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (682 of 13,021 topics). This Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.

Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠95%	Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy (selected)	14%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 417

Article count: 1

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy vs sitewide

Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Can AI restore fiscal sustainability in the US?⁠^70%

Brookings⁠^34%By Ben Harris⁠^98% Neil R. Mehrotra⁠^97% William Overcash⁠^97%7/1/2026, 10:00:38 AM