Author summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Overcash results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 618 faulty-reasoning hits from 417 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (192 of 5,306 authors). This William Overcash is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
William Overcash
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠97%William Overcash (selected)14%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 417
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
William Overcash attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
William Overcash vs sitewide
William Overcash attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos