Topic summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video1,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Transfer results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 511 hits. Analysis detected 2,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (16,361 of 24,545 topics). This Energy Transfer is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Energy Transfer
Topic details
Total words: 4,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos