Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,055 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Energy Economics results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 703 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,110 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (6,607 of 13,019 topics). This Energy Economics is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.

Energy Economics

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠50%	Energy Economics (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 2,110

Article count: 1

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Energy Economics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Energy Economics vs sitewide

Energy Economics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Prolonged war in Iran could test Republicans' loyalty to Trump: poll⁠^13%

AP News⁠^52%By Mike Catalini⁠^29% Linley Sanders⁠^0%3/26/2026, 11:00:51 AM