Topic summary
ā 62%1 analyzed article/video1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These East China Sea results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Slippery Slope, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 2,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ā 59% (6,144 of 14,979 topics). This East China Sea is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
East China Sea
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 0%Alameda County1%
ā 59%East China Sea (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
East China Sea attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
East China Sea vs sitewide
East China Sea attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos