Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ea Sports College Football 26 results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 2,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (14,031 of 21,701 topics). This Ea Sports College Football 26 is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Ea Sports College Football 26
Topic details
Total words: 4,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.1%6.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.4%8.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos