Topic summary
20%1 analyzed article/video1,336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diplomacy And Conflict results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 3,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (10,750 of 11,722 topics). This Diplomacy And Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Diplomacy And Conflict
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Diplomacy And Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Diplomacy And Conflict vs All Other Publications
Diplomacy And Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.