Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Dietary Supplements results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 555 hits. Analysis detected 2,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,457 of 16,454 topics). This Dietary Supplements is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.

Dietary Supplements

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠19%	Dietary Supplements (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 4,052

Article count: 1

Authors

Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Dietary Supplements attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Dietary Supplements vs sitewide

Dietary Supplements attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Should you be taking creatine? Here's what the science says⁠^26%

Scientific American⁠^0%By Jackie Flynn Mogensen⁠^0%7/7/2026, 1:41:00 PM